36.Bongino Reveals Shocking FBI Discovery and Uncovers Alleged Clinton-Obama Scandal

Dan Bongino, former Deputy Director of the FBI, has recently posted an alarming update on his official “X” account, revealing a discovery he claims has shaken him to his core.According to Bongino, a vast and secretive level of corruption within the federal government has been uncovered, hinting at a disturbing reality about how the country is being run.In his post, Bongino shared his shock and disbelief after learning of the scale of corruption and political manipulation embedded within key federal institutions.Bongino, a well-known conservative figure and outspoken critic of what he perceives as the weaponization of law enforcement and intelligence operations, detailed his experience in the FBI.“During my tenure here as the Deputy Director of the FBI, I have repeatedly relayed to you that things are happening that might not be immediately visible, but they are happening,” he wrote.“The Director and I are committed to stamping out public corruption and the political weaponization of both law enforcement and intelligence operations. It is a priority for us. But what I have learned in the course of our properly predicated and necessary investigations into these aforementioned matters, has shocked me down to my core.”Bongino’s admission that the current state of affairs in the government is unsustainable has raised concerns about the integrity of federal agencies like the FBI, which is meant to serve as an impartial institution dedicated to upholding the law. “We cannot run a Republic like this,” he continued, emphasizing his belief that the federal government is failing the American people in significant ways.

As Bongino went on to explain, the discovery he alluded to comes as part of an ongoing investigation that he and his team have been involved with.He reiterated the importance of conducting these investigations by the book and following the law, promising to uncover the truth, no matter how uncomfortable it might be.He declared, “We are going to conduct these righteous and proper investigations by the book and in accordance with the law. We are going to get the answers WE ALL DESERVE. As with any investigation, I cannot predict where it will land, but I can promise you an honest and dignified effort at truth. Not ‘my truth,’ or ‘your truth,’ but THE TRUTH.”This powerful statement echoes a larger sentiment that has been growing in conservative circles: a deep mistrust of the FBI and its alleged role in political and partisan activities.Bongino’s post has sent shockwaves across the political landscape, further fueling discussions about the FBI’s role in political investigations and whether it has become compromised by partisan agendas.Meanwhile, CIA Director John Ratcliffe has made similar claims regarding the ongoing investigations into the so-called Russia collusion narrative.Ratcliffe has revealed that there are more explosive documents awaiting declassification that could shed light on the actions of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and other Obama-era officials.These documents reportedly point to the orchestrated spread of the false Russian interference narrative in the 2016 presidential election.

In particular, Ratcliffe highlighted key findings from the Durham report, which examined the investigations into the Clinton-Trump race. According to Ratcliffe, the intelligence community played a central role in amplifying the fake Steele dossier, which served as the basis for the FBI’s investigation into alleged ties between Donald Trump’s campaign and the Kremlin.The CIA director emphasized that these revelations are critical in understanding the full extent of the political machinations at play.Ratcliffe pointed specifically to “underlying intelligence” that is expected to be released soon, stating that it could reveal the true extent of the involvement of top Obama administration officials in the creation and dissemination of the Steele dossier.“What hasn’t come out yet and what’s going to come out is the underlying intelligence that I have spent the last few months making recommendations about final declassification and sent that to the Department of Justice that will come out in the John Durham report classified annex,” Ratcliffe said in an interview.The intelligence, according to Ratcliffe, will highlight a plan by Hillary Clinton to discredit Donald Trump and manipulate the media narrative in her favor.Ratcliffe specifically stated that the FBI, under then-director James Comey, played an active role in advancing the false narrative by “pouring oil on the fire” and amplifying the fake Russian collusion claims.This, according to Ratcliffe, was part of a coordinated effort to create a scandal that would tarnish Trump’s campaign and presidency.The CIA director also suggested that John Brennan, former CIA Director, and other key intelligence figures, including James Clapper and Comey, have been less than truthful in their public testimonies.

According to Ratcliffe, Brennan’s 2020 testimony before Congress, as well as statements made by other intelligence officials, have now been proven to be false.“He also testified to the House Oversight Committee in 2022. Hillary Clinton testified before John Durham under oath in 2022. James Comey testified before the Senate Committee in September 2020,” Ratcliffe noted.These testimonies are now being scrutinized in light of new revelations that suggest these officials were involved in orchestrating a political hoax against Trump.The investigation into the Steele dossier and its role in launching the FBI’s investigation into the Trump campaign continues to uncover more alarming details.Senior intelligence officials, including Comey and Brennan, have repeatedly denied that the Steele dossier played a central role in their decision to initiate the investigation.However, Ratcliffe’s comments suggest otherwise, as he contends that these officials were fully aware of the dossier’s questionable origins and yet chose to amplify its contents as part of a broader political strategy.The focus now shifts to understanding how these officials conspired to run a hoax and deceive the American public. As the investigation progresses, it is becoming clearer that the FBI’s actions may have been politically motivated and not based on sound intelligence or evidence.Ratcliffe’s comments underscore the gravity of the situation and the need for accountability, particularly given the fact that these actions have had a profound impact on the American political system.

For many, the revelations about the FBI’s role in the Russia collusion investigation have raised significant questions about the agency’s integrity and its ability to operate without political influence.As the country grapples with these findings, there are growing calls for a deeper investigation into the actions of key officials in the FBI, CIA, and other intelligence agencies.The public is demanding transparency and accountability from those who were involved in potentially undermining democracy for political gain.At the center of this investigation is the question of how these individuals, including Clinton, Comey, Brennan, and others, could have conspired to manipulate the narrative surrounding the 2016 election.The idea that a coordinated effort was made to sabotage Trump’s campaign and presidency has sparked outrage among many conservatives and raised concerns about the future of political discourse in the U.S.As the investigation into these actions moves forward, it is clear that the revelations will continue to shake the foundations of the federal government and its intelligence agencies.The truth about what happened during the 2016 election and its aftermath may take years to fully unfold, but it is already clear that significant changes are needed in how intelligence and law enforcement agencies operate in the United States.In the coming months, the release of declassified documents and further testimonies from key figures will provide more clarity on the full extent of the conspiracy against Trump.

As Bongino and Ratcliffe continue to expose the truth, the American people are left to wonder just how deep the corruption runs within the federal government, and what steps will be taken to restore accountability and transparency to the institutions that are supposed to serve the public.

🚨 Time to finally put him behind bars for his crime! Full details in the comments 👇👇

In a dramatic turn of events, John Bolton, former national security adviser, has found himself once again under federal scrutiny. Recently, federal agents raided Bolton’s Bethesda home and Washington office, renewing a longstanding investigation into his handling of classified material.

This latest development brings a sense of urgency to the case that had previously faded into the background after Bolton’s memoir release in 2020. With fresh intelligence gained from foreign sources, the investigation has gained new momentum, raising serious concerns for Bolton and his legal team.

The raids, which took place last week, were authorized by federal judges after prosecutors presented evidence that Bolton may have unlawfully retained or transmitted classified material.

The specific items involved remain under seal, and no charges have been filed yet, but the prospect of criminal charges looms large. The investigation gained new traction under the Biden administration, which has reignited the probe after intelligence agencies reviewed information from a foreign adversary’s spy service, prompting a fresh round of actions.

The case centers on Bolton’s retention of classified communications linked to intercepted foreign intelligence. The New York Times reported that intelligence officials had reviewed these materials and found that Bolton’s involvement might have violated federal law.

The renewed inquiry comes after a lengthy period of dormancy, following the controversial publication of his memoir The Room Where It Happened, which was met with significant pushback from the Trump administration.

At the time, officials argued that Bolton’s memoir contained classified details, but despite these concerns, a judge allowed the book’s release.

Bolton’s memoir, which harshly criticized Trump’s foreign policy and exposed sensitive details about foreign leaders and diplomatic efforts, became a flashpoint in the ongoing debate about the handling of classified information.

While the memoir sparked outrage within the White House, it is now the newly uncovered foreign intelligence intercepts that are driving the investigation forward. These materials have allegedly revealed that Bolton may have mishandled classified communications, which is a violation of federal law.

The precise nature of the communications remains unclear, and whether they were authored by Bolton himself or were related to his associates has yet to be confirmed.

Bolton’s legal team has responded swiftly, with the former national security adviser consulting with defense attorney Abbe Lowell, who has represented other high-profile figures facing federal scrutiny.

In an interview with the Washington Examiner, Bolton briefly addressed the raid, acknowledging its occurrence while simultaneously criticizing Trump’s handling of the Ukraine situation.

His remarks added fuel to the fire, as tensions between Bolton and Trump have remained high since Bolton’s departure from the White House in 2019.

The FBI’s actions have drawn significant attention and debate, particularly with regard to the role that Trump may be playing in these developments. Critics argue that the raid is part of a broader effort to target Trump’s critics and that federal authorities may be pursuing Bolton under pressure from the former president.

Trump, who has repeatedly criticized Bolton since their falling out, weighed in on the investigation, calling Bolton “unpatriotic” and questioning his loyalty and intelligence. Trump’s remarks, which were made last week, only added more fuel to the speculation surrounding the FBI’s actions.

FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino have both publicly weighed in on the investigation, underscoring their commitment to rooting out corruption and holding individuals accountable.

Patel’s statement, “NO ONE is above the law,” reflects the FBI’s stance on the matter, while Bongino added that “public corruption will not be tolerated.”

These statements signal the agency’s intent to pursue this case with vigor, and it is clear that Bolton is not the only individual who could face the consequences of mishandling classified information.

For now, the investigation remains ongoing, and federal prosecutors have not indicated whether additional warrants will be issued or if further searches are planned.

Bolton’s legal team is bracing for the possibility of an indictment, but the outcome remains uncertain. The case is particularly noteworthy because it may set a precedent for how the government pursues classified leaks involving former officials.

If Bolton is charged, it could have far-reaching implications for how sensitive materials are handled by individuals who once held positions of power.

The investigation has drawn attention to the broader issue of how former officials manage classified information once they leave government service.

While Bolton is a prominent figure in this regard, other former officials could face similar scrutiny as the government continues to investigate potential leaks and mishandling of sensitive materials.

As the FBI’s investigation into Bolton progresses, it remains to be seen whether other high-profile individuals will be swept up in the inquiry.

Bolton’s history with the Trump administration is a complicated one. After serving as national security adviser from 2018 to 2019, Bolton became one of Trump’s most vocal critics.

He openly disagreed with Trump’s foreign policy decisions and frequently clashed with the president over issues ranging from North Korea to Iran. Bolton’s memoir, which was released in June 2020, provided a detailed account of his time in the White House and painted a damning picture of Trump’s leadership.

The book’s publication sparked outrage within the White House, with officials claiming that it contained classified material. Despite these concerns, a judge ruled that the book could be published, although it was heavily scrutinized for its contents.

Bolton’s criticisms of Trump have only intensified over time, and the former national security adviser has continued to speak out on issues of foreign policy.

In recent months, he has made frequent appearances in print and broadcast outlets, offering his analysis of international events and the U.S. government’s response.

However, his continued outspoken stance has likely contributed to the renewed interest in his handling of classified information. The FBI’s investigation is not only about whether he mishandled classified material but also about whether his actions were motivated by a desire to undermine the Trump administration.

The fallout from Bolton’s memoir and the subsequent investigation has further polarized an already divided political landscape. Trump and his allies have used the investigation to criticize Bolton, casting him as a disloyal and unpatriotic figure.

Meanwhile, Bolton’s defenders argue that the investigation is politically motivated and part of a broader effort to silence critics of the former president. As the case continues to unfold, it will undoubtedly remain a topic of heated debate and speculation.

In the broader context of the Trump administration’s relationship with the intelligence community, the Bolton case is significant. During Trump’s second term, CIA Director John Ratcliffe briefed Patel on intercepted foreign communications, which are now central to the investigation.

The intelligence community’s review of these materials has brought the issue of classified leaks to the forefront once again. The Justice Department under Trump also sought to block the publication of Bolton’s memoir, arguing that it exposed sensitive information about foreign leaders and ongoing diplomatic efforts.

This pushback from the Trump administration raises questions about how the intelligence community handles leaks and whether political considerations influence the pursuit of such cases.

As Bolton’s legal team prepares for the next steps, it remains unclear what the future holds. Will Bolton face criminal charges for his handling of classified material, or will the investigation fizzle out as others have before it?

The case has already drawn widespread attention and will likely continue to be a focal point of political discourse in the coming months. Whether or not Bolton is ultimately charged, the investigation highlights the ongoing tension between national security concerns, political dynamics, and the accountability of former officials in handling classified information.

For now, the outcome of the Bolton case remains uncertain, but the investigation is a reminder of the ongoing battles over classified material and the complex intersection of politics, security, and the law.

As the FBI continues to investigate Bolton’s actions, the case will undoubtedly shape how future investigations into classified leaks are conducted, potentially setting a precedent for how the government deals with former officials and their handling of sensitive information.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5AYfpTszgQ

Terrifying Canyon Ride Collapse: Tourists Plunge as Earth Splits Beneath Them!

The Canyon Didn’t Just Crack—It Warned Us First

And We Didn’t Listen.

It started with a sound—barely audible over the laughter of tourists snapping selfies against a stunning canyon backdrop. A subtle groan. A shiver in the steel. Then came the chaos.

What was marketed as a once-in-a-lifetime thrill turned, in seconds, into a horror few will ever forget.

And now, with lives shattered and fingers pointing in every direction, investigators are asking: was this an accident of nature—or a manmade failure no one wanted to see coming?

From Awe to Terror in Seconds

The now-infamous canyon attraction had earned viral fame for its daring skywalks, glass-bottom platforms, and heart-racing views. But on this day, it wasn’t fear that thrilled tourists—it was fear that swallowed them.

According to multiple witnesses, a viewing platform teetering over the canyon’s edge began to shake. Some assumed it was part of the ride. But then the support beneath groaned louder. Metal twisted. Concrete split. And in one terrifying lurch, the edge crumbled, taking the structure—and several visitors—with it.

“There was no warning,” said one survivor, “until it was too late.”

The Ground Was Giving Warnings—We Just Didn’t Hear Them

Her Dog Became Suddenly Cheerful—So She Went to the Police, and They Discovered the Unthinkable

It was a quiet Tuesday afternoon at the Maplewood Police Department when the station doors swung open. Officers looked up from their paperwork, mildly curious. What they saw was Mrs. Eleanor Turner, the seventy-two-year-old widow who lived on Oak Street, holding the leash of her golden retriever, Sunny. Normally, Sunny was known in the neighborhood for his calm, almost sleepy demeanor. People often joked that he was the gentlest dog they had ever met, content to lie in the sun for hours. But today was different.

Sunny tugged excitedly at his leash, tail wagging furiously, eyes bright, tongue lolling happily out of his mouth. He barked once, twice, as if urging Eleanor to move faster. Eleanor, a frail but determined woman with silver hair neatly pinned back, cleared her throat and spoke softly to the officer at the front desk.

“Excuse me, Officer Parker… I know this must sound silly, but something’s not right. My Sunny has been acting… unusual. Too cheerful. Almost restless. It’s like he’s trying to tell me something.” Officer Parker raised an eyebrow, glancing from Eleanor to the golden retriever that seemed to radiate excitement. He had heard plenty of odd complaints during his years on duty, but there was something about Eleanor’s anxious sincerity that kept him from dismissing her outright.

“What do you mean by unusual?” he asked, leaning forward. Well,” Eleanor said, patting Sunny’s head, “he’s always been such a calm dog. But since this morning, he’s been jumping around, whining at the door, and pulling me down the street. I finally gave in and followed him, and he led me straight here. He wouldn’t stop until we arrived at the station.”

The officers in the room exchanged amused glances. Still, Parker knew better than to ignore instincts—whether human or animal. He stood and nodded. All right, Mrs. Turner. Why don’t we see where Sunny wants to go?” Within minutes, Parker and two other officers—Rodriguez and Kelly—were outside with Eleanor and Sunny. The golden retriever tugged at the leash, his body practically vibrating with purpose. “Lead the way, boy,” Parker said with a chuckle.

Sunny barked once and began trotting down Main Street. They followed him past the bakery, past the post office, and into the quieter residential area. People on the sidewalks turned their heads, curious to see a pair of uniformed officers trailing behind an elderly woman and her overexcited dog. Sunny made no stops. He moved with determination until they reached an old brick house at the end of Willow Lane. The house had been vacant for months, its shutters closed, paint peeling on the porch.

Sunny whined, pulling harder. He scratched at the gate and barked insistently. Officer Rodriguez frowned. “No one’s supposed to be living here. Place has been empty since the Petersons moved away last year.” Still, something about the dog’s behavior put them on alert. “Let’s check it out,” Parker said. The officers carefully pushed open the creaky gate. Sunny darted forward, his nose to the ground, sniffing eagerly. He ran straight to the back of the house and began pawing at a cellar door half-hidden under the porch. His tail wagged like a flag.

Kelly knelt down and pressed her ear to the old wooden door. Her eyes widened. “Do you hear that? … It sounds like crying.” Everyone froze. Parker quickly motioned for Rodriguez to call it in. Eleanor clutched her chest, whispering, “Oh my goodness.” With a crowbar borrowed from the patrol car, they pried the cellar door open. A waft of damp air escaped, followed by the unmistakable sound of a child sobbing.

Flashlights revealed a little girl, no older than six, sitting on an old blanket. Her eyes were wide, cheeks streaked with tears, but she looked up at them with a mixture of fear and relief. “Sweetheart, it’s okay,” Parker said gently, lowering himself to her level. “We’re the police. You’re safe now.” The girl trembled but didn’t resist when Kelly reached for her hand. Eleanor gasped. “Oh, that poor child…”

At the station later, wrapped in a blanket and sipping hot cocoa, the girl told her story in a small, shaky voice. Her name was Lily. She had been playing in the park the previous afternoon when she got lost. A stranger had found her and promised to help her get home. Instead, she was brought to the abandoned house and left in the cellar. “I was scared,” Lily whispered, hugging the stuffed bunny an officer had given her. “I cried all night. Then this morning I heard barking outside, and it gave me hope. I thought someone would find me.”

All eyes turned to Sunny, who wagged his tail happily, lying at Eleanor’s feet. “He must have heard her,” Eleanor said softly, stroking his head. “He knew she needed help.” News of Sunny’s discovery spread quickly through Maplewood. The local paper ran the headline: “Dog Leads Police to Missing Child.” Reporters wanted to interview Eleanor, and neighbors stopped by with treats for Sunny. But Eleanor remained humble. “I didn’t do anything,” she said. “It was all Sunny. He knew something was wrong, and he wouldn’t rest until we listened.”

The police, however, insisted she accept recognition alongside her dog. At a small ceremony the following week, Chief Reynolds presented Sunny with a bright blue ribbon that read “Hero Dog.” Eleanor’s eyes filled with tears as she clipped it to his collar. “Sometimes,” Reynolds said, addressing the crowd, “heroes come in unexpected forms. Today, a little girl is safe because one dog paid attention when no one else could.” Lily and her parents attended, too. The moment Lily saw Sunny, she broke into a smile and ran to hug him. Sunny licked her face, his tail wagging wildly.

“See?” Eleanor whispered to Parker. “That’s the cheerfulness I saw in him. He knew he had a purpose.” From that day on, Lily often visited Eleanor and Sunny. The little girl and the golden retriever became inseparable playmates. Eleanor, who had lived alone for years, found her quiet house filled with laughter again. And whenever people asked about the day Sunny became overly cheerful, Eleanor would smile and say, “Sometimes joy means more than we realize. Sometimes it means there’s someone out there who needs us.”

36.Bongino Reveals Shocking FBI Discovery and Uncovers Alleged Clinton-Obama Scandal

🚨 Time to finally put him behind bars for his crime! Full details in the comments 👇👇

John Bolton Faces 20 Years In Prison Amid FBI Investigation Into Classified Material

May you like

Terrifying Canyon Ride Collapse: Tourists Plunge as Earth Splits Beneath Them!

Her Dog Became Suddenly Cheerful—So She Went to the Police, and They Discovered the Unthinkable